The Debate Of Nuclear Weapons - 1328 Words

The debate that nuclear weapons kept peace through mutually assured destruction is still quite controversial. Though some historians do not believe this. Eric Hobsbawm states this, â€Å"both sides thus found themselves committed to an insane arms race to mutual destruction.† The interpretations A, B, C, D both agree and disagree with this point and each historian has their on views. Interpretation A and D disagreed with the question however also had a different view and since it was more revisionist blamed America. On the other hand B and C saw nuclear weapons as a deterrent and agreed with the question. However B state they knew about mutually assured destruction. Interpretation A is from a historian who considers the reasons for the US attitude to nuclear weapons. The interpretation by Hobsbawm shows that due to the Americanism ideology, the anti –Red witch hunts and the victory of the communists in China the USA found its self aggressively dealing with the issue. Therefore both sides were committed to an arms race due to fear. Therefore Hobsbawm is stating that America was using nuclear weapons not as a nuclear deterrent but as a threat against the USSR, to halt the spread of communism into the west. The source is correct in bring up certain points that America did threaten other countries with nuclear arms and did almost use them. An example of this very instance was during the Korean War when General MacArthur went to ask president Truman if he could drop an A-bomb onShow MoreRelatedThe Nuclear Debate On Nuclear Weapons3995 Words   |  16 Pages The Nuclear Debate Joe Archbold POL433 11-4-2014 Abstract Beginning in 1945 with the detonation of nuclear weapons, the international system has been an ever-changing climate regarding nuclear weapons. Beginning with the 40 year deterrence of nuclear force during the cold-war and continuing up until the present day. One of the hot button issues of nuclear weapons is the argument whether or not nuclear weapons are necessary or a necessary evil. Carl Sagan and Kenneth Waltz are the forerunnersRead MoreThe Debate On Nuclear Weapons1616 Words   |  7 Pages(Gerald Ferguson) Due to the severity and danger of nuclear weapons, it is very important for nations to have some sort of regulation with regard to the nuclear program and more specifically their nuclear weapons program. After the first nuclear bomb was created by the U.S. nations states that followed the U.S. with the creation of a nuclear bomb seek to justify their creation of the nuclear. There are many reasons why a nation state will create a nuclear bomb but the key issue here is why and how nationsRead MoreThe Discontinuation of Nuclear Weaponry Creation1627 Words   |  7 Pagesthe first and only object of good government†. Have political leaders thrown aside this advice in their pursuit of nuclear arms proliferation? Since 1945, many world leaders have established forms of defense known as nuclear weapons that have the technology and capability to completely annihilate designated regions of the earth. Originally a plan for defense, the creation of nuclear arms has primarily turned in to a show of military strength and superiority with little regard towards the preservationRead MoreA Proposal for the International Elimination of Nuclear Weapons1543 Words   |  7 Pagesset out a model of the Nuclear Weapons Convention (NWC) in 1997. The model underwent revision and reforms in 2007. The text puts a proposal that international law completely eliminates and bans the use of nuclear weapons. The proposal has general support from the international system. Over the years, security at the international level has faced opposition when it comes to the disarmament of nuclear weapons. Discussions that are concerned with the risks of nuclear weapons and the options for disarmamentRead MoreArgument Of Rational Deterrence Theory By Kenneth Waltz1026 Words   |  5 Pagestheory later made by Scott Sagan. Nuclear weapons have been an important issue for debate for years. The spotlight of nuclear weapons was an important factor during the cold war nevertheless the question of nu clear weapons remains afterwards. The question of both the spread and contraction of nuclear weapons remains a strong issue because of the opposing theories that argue against the question of the spread, contraction furthermore the total dissolution of nuclear weapons. What was Waltz argument? WaltzRead MoreBanishment of Nuclear Weapons1192 Words   |  5 Pagescatastrophe† (Krieger 4). The debate over the moral and life threatening potential of nuclear weapons has been in question since the first bomb was detonated almost eight decades ago. Nuclear weapons seem rightly owned by the world’s superpowers in order to ensure protection, yet it is feared that nuclear weapons are the horrible remnant of the Cold War that may still potentially cause unilateral destruction. It has been proposed by several benevolent world powers, that nuclear weapons should be banned fromRead MoreThe Treaty Of The Nuclear Weapons1669 Words   |  7 PagesUse Policy If the nuclear bearing countries recommit themselves to fully embrace the idea of a no first use of their nuclear weapons against another country, then this will be an important step to abolishing the weapons. Although in 1982, the Soviet Union declared its intention of a no first use policy but it did not really stop them from deploying and upgrading their weapons. For this condition to hold, it would entail sweeping and substantial changes to US and Russian nuclear deployments, withRead MoreIs The Movie Fail Safe?938 Words   |  4 Pagestechnology has increased concern about whether humans had command over the use of nuclear weapons or can control nuclear weapons. With respect to this statement the research question for this article is the movie Fail Safe more fact than fiction? How plausible is accidental nuclear war? The movie Fail Safe describes these fears by displaying technology doomsday situation where an error by a computer causes a nuclear bomber group to be deployed against Moscow. Along with describing issues with respectRead MoreNuclear Proliferation Is The Global Spread Of Nuclear Weapons And Technology1748 Words   |  7 PagesNuclear proliferation is the global spread of nuclear weapons and technology. At the end of World War II, the spread of nuclear weapons was happening at an accelerated rate. Countries like the Soviet Union, United Kingdom, France, and China were developing nuclear weapons against the wishes of the United States. In an attempt to stop proliferation, a group of scientists peacefully protested the development of nuclear weapons by sending a petition to the United Nations. The United Nation agreed thatRead MoreNuclear Test B Taking Forward Multilateral Nuclear Weapons1651 Words   |  7 Pages Nuclear Test Ban Taking forward multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations. A. Introduction Talking of the nuclear test ban under international regime the first thing that ticks the mind is the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) which is a multilateral treaty that bans all nuclear explosions, for both civilian and military purposes, in all environments. It was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on September 10, 1996 but has not entered into force